Man, it just keeps getting tougher for the Jews. First we have Bernie Madoff, the crooked investor who ruined lives and lost billions, while making a specialty out of preying on his own kind. We have Barack Obama, who volunteers to surrender most of Israel to the folks who want to kill them as a "first step" towards peace.
And now we have Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla), the new chairwoman of the DNC. She a high-pitched, nasal, hypocritical know-nothing, who makes her leack of gravitas clear every time she opens her mouth - usually with the volume turned up to 11. Some of today's(!) gaffes:
The chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) appears to drive a foreign car, despite criticizing Republican presidential candidates for supposedly favoring foreign auto manufacturers.
"If it were up to the candidates for president on the Republican side, we would be driving foreign cars; they would have let the auto industry in America go down the tubes," she said at a breakfast for reporters organized by The Christian Science Monitor.
But according to Florida motor vehicle records, the Wasserman Schultz household owns a 2010 Infiniti FX35, a Japanese car whose parent company is Nissan, another Japanese company. The car appears to be hers, since its license plate includes her initials.
Stupid? Wait, it gets worse:
In an emotional assault on the Republicans, new Democratic Party Chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Shultz today called the GOP agenda "anti-women" and "a war on women" that will backfire on Republicans in the 2012 election and provide a cushion for President Obama's re-election bid.
"It's just so hard for me to grasp how they could be so anti-women as they are," she said at a breakfast roundtable with reporters.
An emotional assault, indeed. And Republican women did not like it one bit. Maybe Debbie's doing a bit of proejction here; after all, the Democrats are the party of rape...
And of course, Debbie is the only one allowed to speak for the Jews. In fact, no matter how openly her president attempts to destroy Israel, she doesn't even want you to talk about it. Otherwise, she'll...screech:
Wasserman Schultz said the Democratic Party remains politically the “natural home” for the Jewish community, noting that Obama won 78 percent of the Jewish vote in 2008 despite “dire predictions” he would receive much less.
“I think the Republicans are certainly going to attempt to make it an issue” in the 2012 campaign, she said. “We will address the unfounded characterizations of his record and outright lies,” she added.
In meeting Monday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Republican and Democratic Jewish groups, Schultz reportedly urged both parties not the politicize Israel in the 2012 election -– comments that drew an accusation from some Republicans that she was proposing a “gag order.”
“What I think is unfortunate is… that we need to make sure… that Israel never becomes a partisan issue,” Schultz said today. “When it comes to Israel we need to erase the ire.”
By marching them into the sea, I suppose. Well, Debbie - like many American Jews - has chosen the religion of liberalism over the religion of Judaism. Good for her, I suppose, but doesn't that discredit her as a self-appointed national director of Jewish political alliances?
The media will love Debbie, because she is a human sound-bite machine, saying all the things they secretly believe about Republicans. So she'll get plenty of airtime, and her Jewish heritage will be pointed to quite often as she pontificates on Israel.
I feel for the single Jewish women out there. Once a guy hears your surname, sees the twinkle of your Star of David, or sees you drive up in Daddy's BMW, he's going to think of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and her emotional outbursts, her intellectual depravity, and her tendency to screech in outrage. And he'll run, run for the hills, before you hit his wallet and steal his health insurance.
And this may just as well equally apply to Jewish boys, FYI...
Sorry, ladies. Next time you're wondering why you can't get a date, thank the older generation for enslaving themselves to the Democratic party.
And incidentally - if this were, say, Sarah Palin who was the author of all the chaos above, what word would you they be using to describe her?
Friday, May 27, 2011
Shocker: New York Times Lies About Israeli Reaction To Netanyahu's Trip
A Friday full of "surprises"...first, we uncover Obama's terrorist pals boarding a ship to attack Israel, and now we find the house organ of the Obama Administration (that's the New York Times) engaged in bald-faced lying to their dwindling readership about the Israeli reaction to Netanayhu's tumultuous trip to the States. Via Yid with Lid, here's the money shots...first, from the aforementioned Times:
"Israelis See Netanyahu Trip as Diplomatic Failure."
“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel returned from Washington on Wednesday to a nearly unanimous assessment among Israelis that despite his forceful defense of Israel's security interests, hopes were dashed that his visit might advance peace negotiations with the Palestinians.”
Well, the assessment was "nearly unanimous"...except in the opposite direction that the Times is pointing. Israeli left-wing newspaaper Ha'aretz reports:
"Ha'aretz Poll: Netanyahu's Popularity Soaring Following Washington Trip"
A new poll conducted by Dialog, under the supervision of Prof. Camil Fuchs of the Tel Aviv University Statistics Department, showed that 47% of the Israeli public believes Netanyahu's U.S. trip was a success, while only 10% viewed it as a failure...
While in a Haaretz poll five weeks ago Netanyahu seemed to be in hot water with the public, with 38 percent expressing satisfaction with his performance and 53 percent disappointed with it, in yesterday's poll the results were essentially reversed: 51 percent were satisfied, while 36 percent were not.
Not only did Obama empower his arch-rival with his "smart diplomacy", his attack on the prime minister helped strengthen Netanyahu's conservative coalition going into the Israeli election season:
A Telesker poll published in Ma’ariv on Wednesday found that the Likud had strengthened against Kadima. The poll predicted that the Likud would rise from 27 to 30 Knesset seats, while Kadima would fall from 28 to 27.
Asked who was more fit to be prime minister, 36.9% said Netanyahu; 28.3% said Kadima leader Tzipi Livni....
I understand the desire at the NYT to do whatever possible to support their dream administration, especially given that they threw out any journalistic consideration of parity well over a decade ago. But are they not ill-serving their customer base by providing them with deliberately false information? Sure, it makes them feel good for the moment, but in the end, they'll be shocked that their worldview - taken from the pages of the Times - has no real relation to...well, the world's view.
Expect the Times to become a local, Upper West Side-only paper, by....2012. Latest.
"Israelis See Netanyahu Trip as Diplomatic Failure."
“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel returned from Washington on Wednesday to a nearly unanimous assessment among Israelis that despite his forceful defense of Israel's security interests, hopes were dashed that his visit might advance peace negotiations with the Palestinians.”
Well, the assessment was "nearly unanimous"...except in the opposite direction that the Times is pointing. Israeli left-wing newspaaper Ha'aretz reports:
"Ha'aretz Poll: Netanyahu's Popularity Soaring Following Washington Trip"
A new poll conducted by Dialog, under the supervision of Prof. Camil Fuchs of the Tel Aviv University Statistics Department, showed that 47% of the Israeli public believes Netanyahu's U.S. trip was a success, while only 10% viewed it as a failure...
While in a Haaretz poll five weeks ago Netanyahu seemed to be in hot water with the public, with 38 percent expressing satisfaction with his performance and 53 percent disappointed with it, in yesterday's poll the results were essentially reversed: 51 percent were satisfied, while 36 percent were not.
Not only did Obama empower his arch-rival with his "smart diplomacy", his attack on the prime minister helped strengthen Netanyahu's conservative coalition going into the Israeli election season:
A Telesker poll published in Ma’ariv on Wednesday found that the Likud had strengthened against Kadima. The poll predicted that the Likud would rise from 27 to 30 Knesset seats, while Kadima would fall from 28 to 27.
Asked who was more fit to be prime minister, 36.9% said Netanyahu; 28.3% said Kadima leader Tzipi Livni....
I understand the desire at the NYT to do whatever possible to support their dream administration, especially given that they threw out any journalistic consideration of parity well over a decade ago. But are they not ill-serving their customer base by providing them with deliberately false information? Sure, it makes them feel good for the moment, but in the end, they'll be shocked that their worldview - taken from the pages of the Times - has no real relation to...well, the world's view.
Expect the Times to become a local, Upper West Side-only paper, by....2012. Latest.
Shocker: Obama's Best Friends Hate Israel Too
There is a new "blockade-busting" flotilla heading towards Gaza, and the ships are manned by...all the president's men. And women. And terrorists:A U.S. boat, The Audacity of Home, will join the Mavi Marmara flotilla. As Gretzinger notes, “Two of the valiant activists on board will be the president’s favorite domestic terrorists, Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn.” And Rashid Khalidi, a Columbia University professor and former PLO spokesman in Beirut who has also been President Obama’s mentor on the Arab-Israeli conflict, is directly involved in fundraising for the flotilla.
Ayers and Dohrn are domestic terrorists, who - were they allied with a Republican - would have immediately ended any pretense he or she had towards the presidency. They are animals.Khalidi is perhaps one of the greatest skeletons in Obama's closet. The LA Times, as we know, has a videotape of a speech Obama gave in honor of Khalidi ( a hard-core Palestinian activist disguising his terrorist fundraising under the auspices of scholarship) which they refuse to release. Exactly how does one pay tribute to a defender of terrorism? Only Barack and the LA Times know, and they ain't talking. One clue: It isn't by defending Israel.
Coincidentally, Salon printed a piece this morning by Khalidi - again, Obama's "mentor" on Israeli-Palestinian relations - in which he criticizes Obama's speech demanding an Israeli retreat to the 1967 borders as being unfair to the Palestinians, since it insisted on "no involvement of Hamas in the process unless it accepts preconditions such as renunciation of violence and recognition of Israel prior to negotiations....this in effect rules out negotiations."
Any wonder why Obama was so shocked by the response to his "1967 borders" speech? In his mind, and in comparison to his friends, he truly is being moderate. Unbelievable.
Let us pray. Pray that the Israelis sink every f*cking ship in this Flotilla of Hate. Tie Barack Obama in knots, either forcing him to come out as a defender of American and Islamic terrorists, or as a defender of a nation's sovereignty Show the world you won't be bullied by thuggish academics with delusions of grandeur. And make sure that Ayers and Dohrn end up in a deep, watery grave, not unlike their soul-mate, Osama bin Ladan.
Besides helping themselves, they would be doing the United States a tremendous favor as well....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



